Refactor stdout and stderr handling in BuckdLifecycle#1235
Open
Refactor stdout and stderr handling in BuckdLifecycle#1235
Conversation
Contributor
|
@facebook-github-bot has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D93430377. (Because this pull request was imported automatically, there will not be any future comments.) |
142986d to
94f6180
Compare
Summary: Simplified error handling for child process stdout and stderr by replacing unwrap() with the ? operator for better error propagation.
94f6180 to
3d27df2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Simplified error handling for child process stdout and stderr by replacing unwrap() with the ? operator for better error propagation.
.ok_or_else(|| internal_error!(...)).unwrap()with.ok_or_else(|| internal_error!(...))?instart_server_unixbuck2_error::Result<()>, so?propagates the error gracefully instead of panicking the client
?on the line immediately above(
cmd.spawn()?) — this change makes the error handling consistentTest plan
cargo check -p buck2_client_ctx— compiles cleanlycargo test -p buck2_client_ctx— all tests passspawn, the client now returns a descriptive error instead of panicking